Kel hound
Lycosa Syndicate
Surely You're Joking
49
   |
Posted - 2013.08.10 05:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
Black Holes are supposed to be all about the movement right? So why not tailor the effects to cater to skirmish fleets.
(effects given for C6, adjust as necessary for other wormhole class)
Bonus to Gun Optimal and falloff - 2.0
Bonus to Missile Velocity and Explosion Velocity - 2.0
Bonus to Drone Control and Dron Velocity - 2.0
Penalty to Gun Tracking - 0.5
Penalty to Explosion Radius - 0.5
Penalty to Drone Tracking - 0.5
Bonus to AB / MWD Velocity - 2.0
Bonus to Ship Velocity - 1.25
In short, everyone can move faster, hit further - but the trade off is tracking.
Alternatively I love the idea of making black holes the antithesis cataclysmic variables.
Armor repair amount multiplier 2.00
Shield repair amount multiplier 2.00
Shield transfer amount multiplier 0.50
Remote repair amount multiplier 0.50
Capacitor capacity multiplier 0.75
Capacitor recharge time multiplier 0.50
Basically a reduction in total capacitor, but a massive boost to capacitor recharge time and a large boost to local repairs.
|
Kel hound
Lycosa Syndicate
Surely You're Joking
49
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 05:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
Casirio wrote:if we are talking about multiple statics or "hub" wh then leave the undesirable effects and/or no moons. has to have a trade off.
Actually were supposed to be talking about a change to the wormhole effects. A drastic change to black hole systems such as the removal of moons or the addition of one or more static connections would fall outside the purview of the original topic.
Nix Anteris wrote:BLACK HOLES DO NOT NEED TO BE CHANGED
IT IS OK TO HAVE UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS
IF PEOPLE WANT DESIRABLE WORMHOLES THEY SHOULD HAVE TO FIGHT FOR THEM
Sushi Nardieu wrote:It would be a failure to W-space if no one was interested in this system effect.
Blackholes, even lower end wormholes, are abandoned. People -do- fight for desirable wormholes, but nobody fights for undesirable wormholes. Any beneficial change to wormholes will inevitably result in more content for all of us.
Trinkets friend wrote:It has its merits, but it is also open to wild, wild exploitation by crystals, drugs, boosters, the new m odules, the oncoming buff to repairer boost amounts, etc etc etc. It would, in short, result in ridicutanked everything, all the time.
All the wormhole effects are open to some level of abuse, I believe that is kind of the point. Wormhole effects are there to promote lateral thinking, they are there to give a unique home field advantage. In the case of a polar opposite cataclysmic variable this would relatively balanced. Yes, you could possibly run an epic perma tank, but you would also leave yourself wide open to capacitor warfare. Guess what Sleepers specialise in... |